---
title: "Training Data & Intellectual Property — Global Regulatory Comparison | Global AI Monitor"
canonical: https://artificial-intelligence.gi/domains/ai-and-intellectual-property/
source_html: /domains/ai-and-intellectual-property/index.html
description: "Cross-jurisdiction comparison of Training Data & Intellectual Property across 3 markets in Global AI Monitor."
generated_at: 2026-10-25T22:24:54Z
content_sha256: 36b1694d1b4e8f8d8ecfce7b0a57c97ea41d66e6d88d0dc578de8fee6710ffe1
generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0"
---
# Training Data & Intellectual Property — Global Regulatory Comparison | Global AI Monitor

## Jurisdiction Readings (3 markets)

0 Confirmed
3 Probable
0 Uncertain

Jurisdiction Region Status Regulatory Summary Actions

[European Economic Area](/jurisdictions/european-economic-area/) (EEA) Europe 15 claims GPAI providers must keep technical documentation, inform downstream providers, maintain a copyright-compliance policy and publish a training-content summary. The CJEU held its first hearing on generative AI and… [Profile →](/jurisdictions/european-economic-area/)[Brief](/reports/?t=entry&j=EEA)

[United Kingdom](/jurisdictions/united-kingdom/) (UK) Europe 6 claims The copyright and AI reporting duties in sections 135-137 of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 came into force on 20 August 2025. Sections 135-136 required the Secretary of State to publish an economic impact… [Profile →](/jurisdictions/united-kingdom/)[Brief](/reports/?t=entry&j=UK)

[United States – California](/jurisdictions/united-states-california/) (US-CA) Americas 15 claims AB 2013 was approved as Chapter 817, Statutes of 2024. AB 2013 imposes a mandatory posting duty on developers; a preliminary injunction against it was denied. [Profile →](/jurisdictions/united-states-california/)[Brief](/reports/?t=entry&j=US-CA)