Coverage

Jurisdictions covered

Two-Tier Corpus Architecture (As of 2026-10-24): Tier-1 Deep Statutory Dossiers (12/12 Modules Examined) are published for the United Kingdom, European Economic Area (EU AI Act), and United States – California with full instrument-level obligations, verbatim statutory quotes, and dedicated module sub-pages. The remaining 172 monitored jurisdictions are tracked continuously in the Global AI Horizon & Co-Pilot corpus and promoted to full 12-module dossiers as primary AI legislation enters into force.

The jurisdictions with research in this preview. Counts are taken from each jurisdiction’s record.

Research coverage, page built 23 Oct 2026
Jurisdiction	Regulator	Research as of	Record last changed	Instruments	Binding, in force	Obligations	Claims	Sources
European Economic Area	European AI Office (European Commission, DG CNECT)	8 Oct 2026	9 Oct 2026	52	2 +14 binding, in-force date not recorded	56	147	105
United Kingdom	Declared absence: No cross-sector AI regulator. Policy lead: Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT); frontier-risk body: AI Security Institute	8 Oct 2026	9 Oct 2026	43	7 +5 binding, in-force date not recorded	23	140	117
United States – California	Declared absence: No designated AI authority; SB 53 enforcement sits with the Attorney General, and the CPPA regulates automated decision-making technology	8 Oct 2026	9 Oct 2026	68	15 +32 binding, in-force date not recorded	72	294	131

Publication date for every jurisdiction: pending. A declared absence means the research found no single AI regulator and names who holds the relevant powers instead.

What each record does not yet establish, per jurisdiction and module, is on the transparency register.