Last updated · 12 modules · 2 instruments · 31 claims · 24 sources in the cumulative register
Framework status
Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024 (In force since 2024-03-04).
Main regulator
RegulatorAs at 15 Sep 2026 — no AI authority yet designated; PL 2338/2023 would make ANPD the coordinator of a national AI governance system (SIA), but the bill is not law
Next milestone
No upcoming dated milestone recorded
Record status
Live · Periodic active record · 24 sources (19 retrieved) · 4 under review · Not yet expert-reviewed
✦
AI-assembled from cited sources
Evidence-gated · How we verify · DisclosureNot yet expert-reviewed · Not legal, compliance or investment advice. Facts are machine-assembled from cited public sources. Individual claims have not each been independently verified by a human reviewer. See methodology.
Source tiers:T1 enacted statute, regulation, or binding supervisory order · T2 official regulator guidance, consultation, or registry · T3 international standard-setter or peer-reviewed analysis · T4 practitioner commentary or secondary reporting. Confidence:high = corroborated by retrieved T1/T2 text · medium = single official source or secondary corroboration · low = preliminary or unverified. Full definitions →
Research checked · Updated Record history
Research as of · Record last changed · Published · Page built
Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026139 words · last cycle 11 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed
AI Framework Law
Brazil has no general horizontal AI statute in force. The only binding framework-level instrument currently operative is Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024, in force since 4 March 2024, which the Tribunal Superior Eleitoral issued to define artificial intelligence and synthetic content for electoral-propaganda purposes.
Brazil's general AI bill, PL 2338/2023 (Marco Legal da IA), was approved by the Senate in a symbolic vote on 10 December 2024 and remains pending before a Chamber of Deputies special committee as of October 2026; no provision of the bill is yet in force. As at 10 October 2026 the bill was still awaiting the rapporteur's approved opinion in the special committee, with a plenary vote expected only after the October 2026 elections; this specific timeline is reported at Probable confidence from a lower-tier source.
Instruments (1)
Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024 In force since 2024-03-04
Binding
Claims and evidence (3)
PL 2338/2023 (Marco Legal da IA), approved by the Senate on 2024-12-10, remains pending in a Chamber of Deputies special committee awaiting the rapporteur's report as at 2026-10-10, with a plenary vote expected after the October 2026 elections.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 10 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tecnologia AbertaT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 10 Oct 2026PL 2338/2023 continues without the rapporteur's opinion approved in the Chamber's special committee
Brazil's general AI bill, PL 2338/2023, was approved by the Senate in December 2024 and remains pending before a Chamber of Deputies special committee as of October 2026, with no provision yet in force.
Confidence: Confirmed · As of 10 Dec 2024 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Ministério da CulturaT1 · Retrieved · retrieved 10 Dec 2024aprovar, em votação simbólica nesta terça-feira (10), o Projeto de Lei 2.338/2023
Tecnologia AbertaT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 10 Oct 2026PL 2338/2023 continues without the rapporteur's opinion approved in the Chamber's special committee
CASRAIT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Nothing in PL 2338/2023 is in force, and nothing in it creates an obligation for anyone today.
Resolução TSE 23.732/2024 defines AI and synthetic content for electoral propaganda purposes.
Confidence: Probable · As of 27 Feb 2024 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026192 words · last cycle 11 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed
Prohibited Practices
Lei nº 15.487/2026, in force since 7 August 2026, criminalises the use of artificial intelligence to simulate a child or adolescent's participation in sexual-violence content through AI-based adulteration, montage or modification, carrying a penalty of three to five years' imprisonment plus a fine. The same statute aggravates sentencing by one-third to two-thirds where AI or deepfake technology is used to commit, facilitate or conceal a child sexual-violence offence.
In the electoral sphere, Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024, in force since 4 March 2024, prohibits the use of deepfake content to harm or favour a candidacy even where the depicted person has authorised it, and separately forbids AI chatbots and avatars from simulating dialogue with a candidate or other real person in campaign communications.
Resolução TSE nº 23.755, de 2 de março de 2026, in force since 2 March 2026, tightens the rules for the 2026 elections: it imposes a restriction window running from 72 hours before to 24 hours after the close of voting on new synthetic content, requires mandatory AI-use disclosure for paid boosting, and prohibits AI system providers from ranking or recommending candidacies.
Instruments (2)
Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024 In force since 2024-03-04
Binding
Resolução TSE nº 23.755, de 2 de março de 2026 In force since 2026-03-02
Binding
Claims and evidence (9)
Derived: Probable Lei nº 15.487/2026, in force since 2026-08-07, criminalises simulating a child or adolescent's participation in sexual-violence content via AI-based adulteration, montage or modification, punishable by 3 to 5 years' imprisonment plus a fine.
Confidence: Confirmed · As of 6 Aug 2026 · Evidenced
Derived: Probable Lei nº 15.487/2026, in force since 2026-08-07, allows sentence aggravation of one-third to two-thirds for child sexual-violence offences committed, facilitated or concealed using AI or related technologies.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
TSE Resolution 23.732/2024 prohibits using deepfake content to harm or favour a candidacy, even with the depicted person's authorisation.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
TSE Resolution 23.732/2024 forbids AI chatbots/avatars from simulating dialogue with a candidate or other real person in campaign communications.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
TSE Resolution 23.755/2026 tightens 2026-election AI rules: a 72h/24h synthetic-content restriction window, mandatory AI-use disclosure for paid boosting, and a ban on AI ranking of candidacies.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 2 Mar 2026must provide a specific field for the person responsible for the advertising to declare the use of artificial intelligence
Lei 15.487/2026 makes it a crime, punishable by 3-5 years' imprisonment plus fine, to use AI to simulate a child's participation in sexual-violence content.
Confidence: Confirmed · As of 6 Aug 2026 · Evidenced
Resolução TSE 23.732/2024 bans deepfake synthetic content intended to harm or favour a candidacy.
Confidence: Probable · As of 27 Feb 2024 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Consultor Jurídico (ConJur)T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 11 Nov 2026É proibido o uso, para prejudicar ou para favorecer candidatura, de conteúdo sintético em formato de áudio, vídeo ou combinação de ambos, que tenha sido gerado ou manipulado digitalmente
Resolução TSE 23.755/2026 prohibits AI system providers from ranking or recommending candidacies in Brazilian elections.
Confidence: Probable · As of 2 Mar 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral - Diário da Justiça EletrônicoT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026É vedado aos provedores de aplicação que ofertem sistemas de inteligência artificial ou por tecnologia equivalente, ainda que solicitado pela(o) usuária(o): I - ranquear, recomendar, sugerir ou priorizar candidatas(os)
Decreto nº 13.135/2026, effective 2026-11-02, permits AI-based triage, routing and resolution in consumer service only where the consumer may at any time choose to speak with a human, with human telephone/electronic service guaranteed daily from 8am to 8pm.
Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 202688 words · last cycle 11 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed
High-Risk Systems
Decreto nº 13.135/2026, effective from 2 November 2026, governs AI use in consumer-facing service functions. It permits suppliers to deploy AI for triage, routing and resolution of consumer service only where the consumer may at any time elect to speak with a human agent, with human telephone or electronic service guaranteed daily from 8am to 8pm. The same Decreto requires operators of digital-intermediation, transport and delivery platforms to disclose their consumer-service models, including AI-based models, to Senacon, in a form and timeframe that Senacon will establish.
Claims and evidence (3)
Decreto nº 13.135/2026, effective 2026-11-02, permits AI-based triage, routing and resolution in consumer service only where the consumer may at any time choose to speak with a human, with human telephone/electronic service guaranteed daily from 8am to 8pm.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 13 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Trench Rossi WatanabeT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 16 Oct 2026provided the consumer may, at any time, choose to speak with a person
Derived: Probable Decreto nº 13.135/2026, effective 2026-11-02, requires certain digital-intermediation, transport and delivery platform operators to disclose their (potentially AI-based) consumer-service models to Senacon in a form and timeframe Senacon will establish.
Confidence: Probable · As of 17 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Consultor Jurídico (ConJur)T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 17 Oct 2026must present their service models to the Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor
Decreto 13.135/2026 lets suppliers use AI for consumer-service triage provided the consumer can always request real-time human service, guaranteed daily from 8am to 8pm.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 13 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Trench Rossi WatanabeT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 16 Oct 2026provided the consumer may, at any time, choose to speak with a person
Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026275 words · last cycle 11 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed
Transparency & Synthetic Content
Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024, in force since 4 March 2024, is the foundational transparency instrument for AI-generated electoral content. Its Art. 9º-B, caput requires explicit, prominent and accessible disclosure whenever AI-generated synthetic content is used to alter images or sounds in electoral propaganda, together with the technology used; this disclosure duty exempts ordinary image or sound quality adjustments and customary campaign marketing devices. The same Resolução prohibits deepfake content used to harm or favour a candidacy even where the depicted person has authorised it, and separately forbids AI chatbots and avatars from simulating dialogue with a candidate or other real person.
Resolução TSE nº 23.755, de 2 de março de 2026, in force since 2 March 2026, tightens these rules for the 2026 elections. Its Art. 9º-B prohibits paid boosting of new AI-generated synthetic content using a candidate's or public figure's image, voice or likeness during a window running from 72 hours before to 24 hours after the close of voting. The Resolução further mandates explicit AI-content labelling for the 2026 elections generally, bars AI providers from ranking candidacies, and requires paid-boosting providers to offer an AI-use declaration field.
Portaria Conjunta SENACON/SEDIGI/SPDIGI nº 3/2026 has been in force since 22 October 2026 and requires internet application providers with more than 1,000,000 monthly active users in Brazil to maintain a public ad repository that clearly flags AI-generated content, a duty that applies even to providers based abroad. Published 22 September 2026, the Portaria sets a 90-day implementation deadline of 21 December 2026 for ad-intermediation providers to deploy tools identifying material relationships and who commissioned an advertisement.
Instruments (2)
Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024 In force since 2024-03-04
Binding
Resolução TSE nº 23.755, de 2 de março de 2026 In force since 2026-03-02
Binding
Obligations
Art. 9º-B, caput
Disclose, explicitly, prominently and accessibly, when AI-generated synthetic content is used to alter images or sounds in electoral propaganda, and which technology was used.
Transparency disclosure · Applies to: Other · Resolução TSE nº 23.732, de 27 de fevereiro de 2024
Art. 9º-B
Paid boosting of new AI synthetic content using the image, voice or likeness of a candidate or public figure is prohibited during the window from 72 hours before to 24 hours after the close of voting, even if the content is labelled and otherwise compliant.
Prohibition · Applies to: Other · Resolução TSE nº 23.755, de 2 de março de 2026
Claims and evidence (13)
TSE Resolução nº 23.732/2024 Art 9-B §1 prohibits deepfake content used to harm or favour a candidacy, even where the depicted person has authorised it.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
Derived: Probable TSE Resolução nº 23.755/2026, in force since 2026-03-02, mandates explicit AI-content labelling for the 2026 elections, restricts new synthetic content in a 72h/24h polling window, bars AI providers from ranking candidacies, and requires paid-boosting providers to offer an AI-use declaration field.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 2 Mar 2026must provide a specific field for the person responsible for the advertising to declare the use of artificial intelligence
Portaria Conjunta SENACON/SEDIGI/SPDIGI nº 3/2026, in force since 2026-10-22, requires internet application providers above 1,000,000 MAU in Brazil to maintain a public ad repository clearly indicating AI-generated content.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 22 Sep 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
BMA AdvogadosT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026The Portaria takes effect 30 days after publication
Portaria Conjunta SENACON/SEDIGI/SPDIGI nº 3/2026 requires material-relationship identification tools for ad content to be implemented by 2026-12-21, 90 days after the Portaria's 2026-09-22 publication.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 22 Sep 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
BMA AdvogadosT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026The Portaria takes effect 30 days after publication
TSE Resolution 23.732/2024 prohibits using deepfake content to harm or favour a candidacy, even with the depicted person's authorisation.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
TSE Resolution 23.732/2024 requires explicit labelling of AI-generated or manipulated synthetic content used in electoral propaganda.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
TSE Resolution 23.732/2024 forbids AI chatbots/avatars from simulating dialogue with a candidate or other real person in campaign communications.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictitious person (deep fake)
TSE Resolution 23.755/2026 tightens 2026-election AI rules: a 72h/24h synthetic-content restriction window, mandatory AI-use disclosure for paid boosting, and a ban on AI ranking of candidacies.
Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 2 Mar 2026must provide a specific field for the person responsible for the advertising to declare the use of artificial intelligence
Portaria Conjunta 3/2026 requires large ad-intermediation platforms to maintain a public ad repository that clearly flags AI-created content, applying even to providers based abroad.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 22 Sep 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
BMA AdvogadosT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026The Portaria takes effect 30 days after publication
A 90-day deadline (2026-12-21) applies for ad-intermediation providers to implement tools identifying who commissioned an advertisement.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 22 Sep 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
BMA AdvogadosT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026The Portaria takes effect 30 days after publication
Resolução TSE nº 23.732/2024 requires explicit disclosure when AI-generated synthetic content is used to alter images or sounds in electoral propaganda.
Confidence: Probable · As of 27 Feb 2024 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior EleitoralT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026 · Art. 9º-B, caputA utilização na propaganda eleitoral, em qualquer modalidade, de conteúdo sintético multimídia gerado por meio de inteligência artificial para criar, substituir, omitir, mesclar ou alterar a velocidade ou sobrepor imagens ou sons impõe ao responsável pela propaganda o dever de informar, de modo explícito, destacado e acessível que o conteúdo foi fabricado ou manipulado e a tecnologia utilizada.
The AI-content disclosure duty under Resolução TSE nº 23.732/2024 exempts image/sound quality adjustments and customary campaign marketing devices.
Confidence: Probable · As of 27 Feb 2024 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Migalhas (reproducing TSE text)T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 11 Nov 2026 · Art. 9º-B, §2ºI - aos ajustes destinados a melhorar a qualidade de imagem ou de som; II - à produção de elementos gráficos de identidade visual, vinhetas e logomarcas; III - a recursos de marketing de uso costumeiro em campanhas
Resolução TSE nº 23.755/2026 prohibits paid boosting of AI-generated synthetic content using a candidate's or public figure's image, voice or likeness in the 72-hours-before to 24-hours-after voting window.
Confidence: Probable · As of 2 Mar 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral - Diário da Justiça EletrônicoT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026 · Art. 9º-Bimpulsionamento pago de novos conteúdos sintéticos produzidos ou alterados por inteligência artificial ou por tecnologias equivalentes que utilizem imagem, voz ou manifestação de candidata ou candidato ou de pessoa pública, mesmo que rotulados e em conformidade com as demais exigências deste artigo, no período compreendido entre as 72 (setenta e duas) horas que antecedem e as 24 (vinte e quatro) horas que sucedem o término do pleito.
Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026220 words · last cycle 11 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed
Sectoral & Public-Sector AI
The Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (LGPD) governs AI-driven automated decision-making generally: Article 20 gives data subjects the right to request review of solely automated decisions that affect their interests. For breaches of data-protection duties relevant to AI processing, the Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) may fine a controller up to 2% of Brazilian revenue, capped at R$50 million per infraction.
Decreto nº 13.135/2026 requires operators of digital-intermediation, ride-hailing and delivery platforms to present their consumer-service models, including AI-based models, to Senacon on terms that Senacon will set, and permits AI-based consumer-service triage only where the consumer retains the option of real-time human service, guaranteed daily from 8am to 8pm.
In the electoral sector, Resolução TSE nº 23.755/2026 prohibits AI system providers from ranking or recommending candidacies in Brazilian elections, and Portaria Conjunta SENACON/SEDIGI/SPDIGI nº 3/2026 requires large ad-intermediation platforms to maintain a public ad repository that clearly flags AI-created content, applying even to providers based abroad.
Outside these binding instruments, the ANPD has published a preliminary technical note on AI-based automated decisions under LGPD Article 20, signalling possible future rules without itself creating binding obligations. The Central Bank of Brazil has adopted no AI-specific prudential rule and instead monitors AI adoption among regulated financial institutions through existing cross-cutting norms and market surveys.
Instruments (1)
Resolução TSE nº 23.755, de 2 de março de 2026 In force since 2026-03-02
Binding
Claims and evidence (8)
Decreto 13.135/2026 lets suppliers use AI for consumer-service triage provided the consumer can always request real-time human service, guaranteed daily from 8am to 8pm.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 13 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Trench Rossi WatanabeT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 16 Oct 2026provided the consumer may, at any time, choose to speak with a person
Digital intermediation, ride-hailing and delivery platform operators must present their consumer-service models, including AI-based ones, to Senacon on terms Senacon will set.
Confidence: Probable · As of 17 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Consultor Jurídico (ConJur)T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 17 Oct 2026must present their service models to the Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor
LGPD Art. 20 gives data subjects the right to request review of solely automated decisions affecting their interests.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Blog do Direito IDPT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026direito a solicitar a revisão de decisões tomadas unicamente com base em tratamento automatizado
ANPD published a preliminary technical note on AI-based automated decisions under LGPD Art.20, signalling possible future rules without creating binding obligations.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Lefosse AdvogadosT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026reconhece que a ANPD pode aprofundar o tema por meio de guias e estudos técnicos
ANPD may fine a controller up to 2% of Brazilian revenue capped at R$50 million per infraction for breaches of data-protection duties relevant to AI processing.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
LGPD Brasil.infoT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026multa simples, de até 2% (dois por cento) do faturamento da pessoa jurídica
Portaria Conjunta 3/2026 requires large ad-intermediation platforms to maintain a public ad repository that clearly flags AI-created content, applying even to providers based abroad.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 22 Sep 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
BMA AdvogadosT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026The Portaria takes effect 30 days after publication
The Central Bank of Brazil has no AI-specific prudential rule and instead monitors AI adoption in regulated financial institutions through existing cross-cutting norms and market surveys.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Let's MoneyT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Do outro lado da assimetria que ele apontou estão as cooperativas singulares e as instituições de pagamento
Resolução TSE 23.755/2026 prohibits AI system providers from ranking or recommending candidacies in Brazilian elections.
Confidence: Probable · As of 2 Mar 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral - Diário da Justiça EletrônicoT1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026É vedado aos provedores de aplicação que ofertem sistemas de inteligência artificial ou por tecnologia equivalente, ainda que solicitado pela(o) usuária(o): I - ranquear, recomendar, sugerir ou priorizar candidatas(os)
Digital intermediation, ride-hailing and delivery platform operators must present their consumer-service models, including AI-based ones, to Senacon on terms Senacon will set.
Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026118 words · last cycle 11 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed
Authorities & Enforcement
The Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) is empowered to fine a controller up to 2% of Brazilian revenue, capped at R$50 million per infraction, for breaches of data-protection duties relevant to AI processing. Senacon oversees compliance by digital-intermediation, ride-hailing and delivery platform operators, which must present their consumer-service models, including AI-based models, to Senacon on terms Senacon will set.
On the electoral side, a study by ITS Rio and the Ministério Público Federal reportedly found a 90% average rate of AI-based candidate ranking despite the TSE's prohibition on such ranking, a finding that raises potential liability under the TSE regime; this finding is Uncertain and should be treated as provisional pending further verification.
Claims and evidence (3)
Digital intermediation, ride-hailing and delivery platform operators must present their consumer-service models, including AI-based ones, to Senacon on terms Senacon will set.
Confidence: Probable · As of 17 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
Consultor Jurídico (ConJur)T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 17 Oct 2026must present their service models to the Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor
ANPD may fine a controller up to 2% of Brazilian revenue capped at R$50 million per infraction for breaches of data-protection duties relevant to AI processing.
Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
LGPD Brasil.infoT3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026multa simples, de até 2% (dois por cento) do faturamento da pessoa jurídica
An ITS Rio/MPF study found a 90% average AI candidate-ranking rate despite the TSE ban, raising potential liability.
Confidence: Uncertain · As of 1 Jul 2026 · Evidenced
Evidence and sources
TerraT2 · Retrieved · retrieved 11 Nov 2026O parâmetro adotado é a Resolução nº 23.755/2026 do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral, publicada em março deste ano, que veda a provedores de sistemas de inteligência artificial ranquear
