artificial-intelligence.giGlobal AI Monitor

Italy AI Regulation & Governance

IT10 active modules2 quiet

Last updated · 12 modules · 4 instruments · 21 claims · 54 sources in the cumulative register

Framework status
AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (In force since 2024-08-01).
Main regulator

RegulatorAgID (Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale) and ACN (Agenzia per la Cybersicurezza Nazionale) — designated national AI authorities under Law 132/2025

Next milestone
No upcoming dated milestone recorded
Record status
Live · Periodic active record · 54 sources (50 retrieved) · 10 under review · Not yet expert-reviewed
AI-assembled from cited sources
Evidence-gated · How we verify ·
DisclosureNot yet expert-reviewed · Not legal, compliance or investment advice. Facts are machine-assembled from cited public sources. Individual claims have not each been independently verified by a human reviewer. See methodology.

Source tiers: T1 enacted statute, regulation, or binding supervisory order · T2 official regulator guidance, consultation, or registry · T3 international standard-setter or peer-reviewed analysis · T4 practitioner commentary or secondary reporting. Confidence: high = corroborated by retrieved T1/T2 text · medium = single official source or secondary corroboration · low = preliminary or unverified. Full definitions →

Research checked · Updated
Record history

Research as of · Record last changed · Published · Page built

Jump to module (12)

#

AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (In force since 2024-08-01).

2 instruments (2 current) · 0 obligations · 4 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 221 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Italy's AI governance architecture rests on direct application of the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), in force in Italy since 1 August 2024 and amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, together with Italy's national framework statute, Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, which entered into force on 10 October 2025 and designates the Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale (AgID) and the Agenzia per la Cybersicurezza Nazionale (ACN) as Italy's national AI authorities.

Article 20 of Legge 132/2025 assigns AgID the role of AI Act notifying authority and gives ACN the roles of market-surveillance authority, single EU contact point and inspection/sanctioning authority, without prejudice to Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS continuing as sectoral market-surveillance authorities in their supervised sectors. The implementing decree, D.Lgs. 160/2026, confirms this allocation, naming AgID as the AI Act notifying authority and ACN as market-surveillance authority, with Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS retaining sectoral competence for high-risk AI within their supervised sectors.

Instruments (2)
  • AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 In force since 2024-08-01
    Binding
  • Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 (Disposizioni e deleghe al Governo in materia di intelligenza artificiale) In force since 2025-10-10
    Binding · Official text
Claims and evidence (4)

  • Legge 132/2025 Art 20 designates AgID as the AI Act notifying authority and ACN as the market-surveillance authority, single EU contact point and inspection/sanctioning authority, without prejudice to Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS as sectoral market-surveillance authorities.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 10 Oct 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • AI Resources T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026In order to ensure the application and implementation of national and European Union legislation on artificial intelligence, the Agency for Digital Italy (AgID) and the National Cybersecurity Agency (ACN) are designated as National Authorities for Artificial Intelligence

  • Derived: Probable The Digital Omnibus (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force 27 July 2026) deferred the AI Act Annex III high-risk rules from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027, and the Annex I high-risk rules from 2 August 2027 to 2 August 2028.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 24 Jul 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • ActuIA T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026It moved the rest of the timeline: high-risk systems listed in Annex III are only covered from 2 December 2027.

  • Derived: Probable Legge 132/2025, Italy's national AI law, entered into force on 10 October 2025 and designates AgID and ACN as national AI authorities.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • AI Resources T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026In order to ensure the application and implementation of national and European Union legislation on artificial intelligence, the Agency for Digital Italy (AgID) and the National Cybersecurity Agency (ACN) are designated as National Authorities for Artificial Intelligence

  • D.Lgs. 160/2026 designates AgID as AI Act notifying authority and ACN as market-surveillance authority, with Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS as sectoral authorities for high-risk AI in their supervised sectors.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 23 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • 4Crypto T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Certain models released under a free and open-source licence may be exempt from part of the documentation and information duties where the conditions of Article 53(2) are met.
    • Noze T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 10 Nov 2026AgID is the notifying authority, ACN handles market surveillance and is the single point of contact, Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS cover high-risk systems in their sectors.

#

Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (In force since 2026-07-27).

1 instrument (1 current) · 0 obligations · 2 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 96 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Italy's prohibited-practices position combines the AI Act's Article 5 prohibited-practice regime, now running on the timetable set by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI), with a standing national prohibition specific to Italy.

The Digital Omnibus, in force since 27 July 2026, deferred the AI Act's Annex III high-risk-system rules to 2 December 2027 and the Annex I high-risk rules to 2 August 2028. Separately, Italy's national moratorium on facial-recognition video surveillance in public and publicly accessible spaces has been extended to 31 December 2027, maintaining a domestic restriction that operates alongside the EU-level prohibited-practice regime.

Instruments (1)
  • Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 In force since 2026-07-27
    Binding
Claims and evidence (2)

  • Derived: Probable Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus) defers the AI Act's Annex III high-risk rules to 2 December 2027 and Annex I high-risk rules to 2 August 2028.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 24 Jul 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • ActuIA T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026It moved the rest of the timeline: high-risk systems listed in Annex III are only covered from 2 December 2027.

  • Derived: Probable Italy's national moratorium on facial-recognition video surveillance in public/publicly accessible spaces is extended to 31 December 2027.

    Confidence: Probable · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Amnesty International Italia T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026The moratorium on installing and using facial-recognition systems in public places is in force until 31 December 2027.

#

AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (In force since 2024-08-01).

2 instruments (2 current) · 0 obligations · 2 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 95 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

High-risk AI systems placed on the market or put into service in Italy are governed directly by the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, which entered into force on 27 July 2026.

The Digital Omnibus deferred the AI Act's Annex III high-risk-system rules from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027, and deferred the Annex I high-risk rules from 2 August 2027 to 2 August 2028. Both deferrals apply directly in Italy as amendments to a directly applicable Regulation, with no national transposing instrument required.

Instruments (2)
  • AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 In force since 2024-08-01
    Binding
  • Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 In force since 2026-07-27
    Binding
Claims and evidence (2)

  • Derived: Probable The Digital Omnibus (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force 27 July 2026) deferred the AI Act Annex III high-risk rules from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027, and the Annex I high-risk rules from 2 August 2027 to 2 August 2028.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 24 Jul 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • ActuIA T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026It moved the rest of the timeline: high-risk systems listed in Annex III are only covered from 2 December 2027.

  • Derived: Probable Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus) defers the AI Act's Annex III high-risk rules to 2 December 2027 and Annex I high-risk rules to 2 August 2028.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 24 Jul 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • ActuIA T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026It moved the rest of the timeline: high-risk systems listed in Annex III are only covered from 2 December 2027.

#

AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (In force since 2024-08-01).

1 instrument (1 current) · 0 obligations · 1 claim · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 98 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the market in Italy are bound directly by Article 53 of the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). That provision requires GPAI model providers to prepare and maintain technical documentation, provide downstream deployers with the information needed for their own AI Act compliance, adopt a policy to comply with EU copyright law, and publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the content used to train the model.

These obligations apply directly in Italy as part of the AI Act's EU-wide regime; no separate national GPAI-specific instrument is recorded in the current standing position.

Instruments (1)
  • AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 In force since 2024-08-01
    Binding
Claims and evidence (1)

  • GPAI model providers must prepare technical documentation, provide downstream compliance information, adopt a copyright policy, and publish a training-content summary under AI Act Art 53.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • 4Crypto T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Certain models released under a free and open-source licence may be exempt from part of the documentation and information duties where the conditions of Article 53(2) are met.

#

Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 (Disposizioni e deleghe al Governo in materia di intelligenza artificiale) (In force since 2025-10-10).

1 instrument (1 current) · 0 obligations · 2 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 109 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, in force since 10 October 2025, provides Italy's binding transparency regime for synthetic content and AI-assisted professional work.

Article 26 of the law inserted a new Article 612-quater into the Codice Penale, punishing with imprisonment of one to five years anyone who causes unjust harm by distributing, without consent, AI-generated or altered deepfake images, videos or voices suitable to mislead about their genuineness.

Separately, Article 13 of Legge 132/2025 permits licensed intellectual professionals in Italy to use AI systems for instrumental and support activities, provided that human intellectual work remains predominant and the professional clearly discloses to the client the AI systems used.

Instruments (1)
  • Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 (Disposizioni e deleghe al Governo in materia di intelligenza artificiale) In force since 2025-10-10
    Binding · Official text
Claims and evidence (2)

  • Derived: Probable Legge 132/2025 Art 26 inserts new Art 612-quater into the Codice Penale, punishing with 1-5 years' imprisonment anyone who causes unjust harm by distributing non-consensual AI-generated or altered deepfake images, videos or voices suitable to mislead about their genuineness.

    Confidence: Probable · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Giurisprudenza Penale T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Anyone who causes unjust harm to a person by transferring, publishing or otherwise disseminating, without their consent, falsified or altered images, videos or voices using AI systems

  • Article 13 of Italian Law No. 132/2025 (in force 10 October 2025) permits licensed intellectual professionals in Italy to use AI systems for instrumental and support activities provided human intellectual work remains predominant and the professional clearly discloses the AI systems used to the client.

    Confidence: Probable · Not recorded
    Evidence and sources
    • Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, Articolo 13 T1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026 · Art. 13L'utilizzo di sistemi di intelligenza artificiale nelle professioni intellettuali è finalizzato al solo esercizio delle attività strumentali e di supporto all'attività professionale e con prevalenza del lavoro intellettuale oggetto della prestazione d'opera; il professionista comunica al soggetto destinatario le informazioni relative ai sistemi di intelligenza artificiale utilizzati.

#

Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) (In force since 2026-10-23).

2 instruments (2 current) · 0 obligations · 4 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 214 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Italy's AI and intellectual-property position rests on two binding instruments: Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, in force since 10 October 2025, and Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160, implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, in force since 30 September 2026.

Instruments (2)
  • Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) In force since 2026-10-23
    Binding · Official text
  • Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 (Disposizioni e deleghe al Governo in materia di intelligenza artificiale) In force since 2025-10-10
    Binding · Official text
Claims and evidence (4)

  • Legge 132/2025 inserted the word 'umano' into Art 1 of Legge 633/1941, confirming only works of human intellectual creation are protected, while works with genuine human creative control remain eligible.

    Confidence: Probable · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Doctrine.it T2 · RetrievedWorks of human intellectual creation belonging to literature, music, the figurative arts are protected under this law

  • Legge 132/2025 permits reproductions/extractions for text-and-data-mining using AI models on lawfully accessed material in conformity with Arts 70-ter and 70-quater of Legge 633/1941: research organisations and cultural-heritage institutions need no authorisation for scientific research; general TDM is permitted unless the rightholder has exercised an opt-out.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • IT Law Firm (Studio Legale Cunegatti) T3 · Retrievedtext and data mining (TDM) may be carried out by research organizations and cultural heritage institutions for scientific research purposes, using works or other materials available in networks or databases to which they have lawful access.

  • Derived: Probable Legge 132/2025 Art 26 inserts a new offence into Art 171(1) of Legge 633/1941 punishing reproduction or extraction of text or data in violation of Arts 70-ter/70-quater, including when done through AI systems.

    Confidence: Probable · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources

  • D.Lgs 160/2026 Art 52 extends Industrial Property Code trade-secret protection to data, algorithms and mathematical methods used to train AI systems where they qualify as protectable business information or technical-industrial know-how.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 8 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Innovation Post T3 · Retrievedthe data, algorithms and mathematical methods used to train artificial intelligence systems

#

Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) (In force since 2026-10-23).

1 instrument (1 current) · 0 obligations · 1 claim · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 54 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160, in force since 30 September 2026, addresses sectoral AI literacy at Capo III of the decree. It requires professionals to undertake AI-related training within the continuing-education programmes run by their professional orders, as part of a cross-cutting AI-literacy pathway that also covers schools, the workplace and healthcare.

Instruments (1)
  • Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) In force since 2026-10-23
    Binding · Official text
Claims and evidence (1)

  • D.Lgs 160/2026 Capo III requires professionals to undertake AI-related training within the continuing-education programmes of their professional orders, part of a cross-cutting AI-literacy pathway covering schools, work, healthcare and the professions.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 8 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • PMI.it T3 · RetrievedProfessionals must follow AI courses within the continuing education of their professional orders, while compliance oversight is entrusted to AgID and ACN

#

Nothing recorded for this module in the research of 2026-11-12.

0 instruments · 0 obligations · 0 claims

#

Nothing recorded for this module in the research of 2026-11-12.

0 instruments · 0 obligations · 0 claims

#

AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (In force since 2024-08-01).

3 instruments (3 current) · 0 obligations · 9 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 417 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Italy's AI enforcement architecture operates across three binding instruments: the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), in force since 1 August 2024; Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, in force since 10 October 2025; and the implementing Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160, in force since 30 September 2026.

Instruments (3)
  • AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 In force since 2024-08-01
    Binding
  • Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) In force since 2026-10-23
    Binding · Official text
  • Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132 (Disposizioni e deleghe al Governo in materia di intelligenza artificiale) In force since 2025-10-10
    Binding · Official text
Claims and evidence (9)

  • Legge 132/2025 Art 20 designates AgID as the AI Act notifying authority and ACN as the market-surveillance authority, single EU contact point and inspection/sanctioning authority, without prejudice to Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS as sectoral market-surveillance authorities.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 10 Oct 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • AI Resources T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026In order to ensure the application and implementation of national and European Union legislation on artificial intelligence, the Agency for Digital Italy (AgID) and the National Cybersecurity Agency (ACN) are designated as National Authorities for Artificial Intelligence

  • Derived: Probable AI Act Art 99 sets three fine tiers (whichever is higher of fixed sum or percentage of worldwide turnover): up to EUR35m or 7% for Art 5 prohibited-practice breaches; up to EUR15m or 3% for most operator obligations; up to EUR7.5m or 1% for supplying incorrect/incomplete/misleading information, with SMEs/start-ups instead taking the lower of the two figures.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • GovernanceDocs T3 · Retrievedup to €35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover for a prohibited practice, up to €15 million or 3% for most other obligations, and up to €7.5 million or 1% for supplying incorrect information to authorities.

  • Derived: Probable D.Lgs 160/2026 sets Italy's own national administrative-fine bands for AI Act breaches, mirroring the EU EUR35m/7%-turnover ceiling for the most serious breaches but fixing lower national maxima for lesser breaches (e.g. EUR1m or 0.5% turnover for Arts 27/86 information duties), allowing non-pecuniary measures for low-offensiveness violations, with proceeds earmarked to AgID and ACN budgets.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 8 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • ICT Security Magazine T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026incorrect, incomplete or misleading; 1 million or 0.5% for the obligations in Articles 27 and 86 of the AI Act.

  • Derived: Probable Legge 132/2025 Art 26 inserts new Art 612-quater into the Codice Penale, punishing with 1-5 years' imprisonment anyone who causes unjust harm by distributing non-consensual AI-generated or altered deepfake images, videos or voices suitable to mislead about their genuineness.

    Confidence: Probable · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Giurisprudenza Penale T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Anyone who causes unjust harm to a person by transferring, publishing or otherwise disseminating, without their consent, falsified or altered images, videos or voices using AI systems

  • Derived: Probable Legge 132/2025 Art 26 amends Art 2637 of the Codice Civile to punish market manipulation (aggiotaggio) committed through AI systems with 2-7 years' imprisonment, an AI-specific aggravating factor.

    Confidence: Probable · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Giurisprudenza Penale T2 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026sull'articolo 2637 del codice civile (aggiotaggio) aggiungendo il seguente periodo: "La pena è della reclusione da due a sette anni se il fatto è commesso mediante l'impiego di sistemi di intelligenza

  • D.Lgs 160/2026 attributes ACN the inspection and market-surveillance powers under the AI Act and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, acting as single EU contact point, while AgID remains the notifying authority for conformity-assessment bodies and Banca d'Italia, CONSOB, IVASS and the Garante retain their sectoral market-surveillance roles.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 8 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Ingenio T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Article 15 of the decree grants it the supervisory and inspection powers provided by the European AI legislation and by Regulation (EU) 2019/1020

  • Derived: Probable Legge 132/2025, Italy's national AI law, entered into force on 10 October 2025 and designates AgID and ACN as national AI authorities.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 25 Sep 2025 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • AI Resources T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026In order to ensure the application and implementation of national and European Union legislation on artificial intelligence, the Agency for Digital Italy (AgID) and the National Cybersecurity Agency (ACN) are designated as National Authorities for Artificial Intelligence

  • D.Lgs. 160/2026 designates AgID as AI Act notifying authority and ACN as market-surveillance authority, with Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS as sectoral authorities for high-risk AI in their supervised sectors.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 23 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • 4Crypto T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Certain models released under a free and open-source licence may be exempt from part of the documentation and information duties where the conditions of Article 53(2) are met.
    • Noze T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 10 Nov 2026AgID is the notifying authority, ACN handles market surveillance and is the single point of contact, Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS cover high-risk systems in their sectors.

  • D.Lgs. 160/2026 sets administrative fine tiers mirroring AI Act Article 99, up to EUR 35 million or 7% of worldwide turnover for the most serious breaches.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 23 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • 4Crypto T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Certain models released under a free and open-source licence may be exempt from part of the documentation and information duties where the conditions of Article 53(2) are met.

#

Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) (In force since 2026-10-23).

1 instrument (1 current) · 0 obligations · 2 claims · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 69 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160, in force since 30 September 2026, establishes Italy's AI regulatory sandbox at Article 26. The sandbox operates under the direct supervision of Italy's AI authorities, with Article 26(2) providing scope for further regional, local or cross-border sandboxes.

The sandbox is jointly managed by AgID and ACN, operating under Article 57 of the AI Act, and gives priority access to SMEs and start-ups.

Instruments (1)
  • Decreto legislativo 9 settembre 2026, n. 160 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) In force since 2026-10-23
    Binding · Official text
Claims and evidence (2)

  • Derived: Probable D.Lgs. 160/2026 Art 26 establishes the Italian AI regulatory sandbox, jointly managed by AgID and ACN under AI Act Art 57, with priority access for SMEs and start-ups.

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 8 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • Altalex T3 · Surfaced · retrieved 2 Nov 2026confirms that AgID and ACN jointly manage, according to their respective competences, the national sandbox that Art.

  • D.Lgs. 160/2026 Article 26 establishes a national AI regulatory sandbox under the direct supervision of Italy's AI authorities, with scope for further regional, local or cross-border sandboxes under Article 26(2).

    Confidence: Probable (capped: best source is T3) · As of 23 Oct 2026 · Evidenced
    Evidence and sources
    • 4Crypto T3 · Retrieved · retrieved 2 Nov 2026Certain models released under a free and open-source licence may be exempt from part of the documentation and information duties where the conditions of Article 53(2) are met.

#

Article 13 of Italian Law No. 132/2025 (in force 10 October 2025) permits licensed intellectual professionals in Italy to use AI systems for instrumental and support activities provided human intellectual work remains predominant and the professional clearly discloses the AI systems used to the client.

0 instruments (0 current) · 0 obligations · 1 claim · 0 milestones

Standing sub-brief · as of 12 Nov 2026 58 words · last cycle 12 Nov 2026 · AI research, not expert reviewed

Article 13 of Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, in force since 10 October 2025, governs commercial use of AI by licensed intellectual professionals in Italy. It permits such professionals to use AI systems for instrumental and support activities, provided that human intellectual work remains predominant and the professional clearly discloses to the client the AI systems used.

Claims and evidence (1)

  • Article 13 of Italian Law No. 132/2025 (in force 10 October 2025) permits licensed intellectual professionals in Italy to use AI systems for instrumental and support activities provided human intellectual work remains predominant and the professional clearly discloses the AI systems used to the client.

    Confidence: Probable · Not recorded
    Evidence and sources
    • Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, Articolo 13 T1 · Surfaced · retrieved 11 Nov 2026 · Art. 13L'utilizzo di sistemi di intelligenza artificiale nelle professioni intellettuali è finalizzato al solo esercizio delle attività strumentali e di supporto all'attività professionale e con prevalenza del lavoro intellettuale oggetto della prestazione d'opera; il professionista comunica al soggetto destinatario le informazioni relative ai sistemi di intelligenza artificiale utilizzati.
No modules match.

Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups.

Authorities

No authorities recorded in this research.

Enforcement actions

No enforcement actions recorded in this research.

Cases

No cases recorded in this research.

Consultations

No consultations recorded in this research.

What this record does not yet establish is set out on the transparency register; its dated events are on the regulatory calendar.

Think something on this page is wrong? Report an error.

Technical provenance (record schema, run ID & build metadata)
Schema version
artificial-intelligence-record-v2.12
Research run ID
aic-union-IT-2026-11-02
Page model
module-card-page-v1
Renderer
render_jid_aic_v13
Build date